Abstract :
Imaging mass spectrometry requires the acquisition and interpretation of hundreds to thousands of individual spectra in order to map the
mineral phases within heterogeneous geomatrices. A fuzzy logic inference engine (FLIE) was developed to automate data interpretation. To
evaluate the strengths and limitations of FLIE, the chemical images obtained using FLIE were compared with those developed using two
chemometric methods: principle component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (K-Means). Two heterogeneous geomatrices, a low-grade
chalcopyrite ore and basalt, were imaged using a laser-desorption Fourier transform mass spectrometer. Similar mineral distribution patterns in the
chalcopyrite ore sample were obtained by the three data analysis methods with most of the differences occurring at the interfaces between mineral
phases. PCA missed one minor mineral phase in the chalcopyrite ore sample and did not clearly differentiate among the mineral classes of the
basalt. K-Means cluster analysis differentiated among the various mineral phases in both samples, but improperly grouped some spectra in the
chalcopyrite sample that only contained unanticipated high mass peaks. Unlike the chemometric methods, FLIE was able to classify spectra as
unknowns for those spectra that fell below the confidence level threshold. A nearest neighbor approach, included in FLIE, was used to classify the
unknowns to form a visually complete image; however, the unknowns identified by FLIE can be informative because they highlight potential
problems or overlooked results. In conclusion, this study validated the fuzzy logic-based approach used in our laboratory and reveald some
limitations in the three techniques that were evaluated
Keywords :
Chemical imaging , Mineral , Fuzzy logic , Principal component analysis , cluster analysis , Laser desorption Fourier transform mass spectrometry