Title of article
Response Rate and Toxicity of Docetaxel / Cisplatin /5FU in Comparison with Cisplatin / 5FU Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Author/Authors
Ameri، Ahmad نويسنده Associate Professor of Radiation Oncology , , Azghandi، Samira نويسنده Radiation oncologist , , Khorsandi، Mohammad Taghi نويسنده Professor of Otorhinolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Amir-Alam Hospital , , Karimi Sangchini، Ebrahim نويسنده Postgraduate Student, watershed management. Gorgan university, Iran , , Yazdani، Nasrin نويسنده Tehran university of medical science, , , Haghighatkhah، Hamid Reza نويسنده Associate professor of radiology , , Malekshoar، Mehran نويسنده Radiologist ,
Issue Information
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages
8
From page
11
To page
18
Abstract
Introduction: Response to chemotherapy is a reliable marker for radiation sensitivity in patients with locally
advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. We compared the response rate and toxicity after two cycles
of chemotherapy using Docetaxel / Cisplatin /5FU or Cisplatin / 5FU among these patients.
Materials and methods: We randomly assigned 16 to 75 years old patients with stage III or IV non-metastatic
locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma to receive either DCF or CF every 3 weeks for two
cycles. All patients who received at least one and two cycles of chemotherapy were considered for toxicity and
response evaluation respectively.
Results: Seventy patients underwent randomization, 36 and 34 patients were assigned to Docetaxel / Cisplatin
/5FU and Cisplatin / 5FU groups respectively. Three and 8 patients were excluded after randomization and before
receiving any chemotherapy in Docetaxel / Cisplatin /5FU and Cisplatin / 5FU groups respectively. Finally 30 and
25 in Docetaxel / Cisplatin /5FU group and 25 and 23 patients in Cisplatin / 5FU group were evaluated for toxicity
and response respectively. Response rate (complete and partial response) was %83 (35% complete and 48%
partial response) and %84(16% complete and 68% partial response) in Cisplatin / 5FU and Docetaxel / Cisplatin
/5FU groups respectively (P= 0.28). There was no differences in complete response rate between two groups
(P=0.18). Neutropenia, phlebitis and mucositis were more common in Cisplatin / 5FU group without statistically
significant difference. Constipation was significantly more common in Cisplatin / 5FU group (P= 0.008). Diarrhea,
alopecia and febrile neutropenia were significantly more common in Docetaxel / Cisplatin /5FU group (P= 0.006,
0.01 and 0.03 respectivly).
Conclusion: We could not find any significant differences between response to Docetaxel / Cisplatin /5FU
and Cisplatin /5FU combination chemotherapy among Iranian patients with locally advanced head and neck
squamous cell carcinoma. However, for better evaluation, larger studies with better designs are being conducted
in our center.
Journal title
Reports of Radiotherapy and Oncology
Serial Year
2013
Journal title
Reports of Radiotherapy and Oncology
Record number
1148792
Link To Document