Title of article :
Parliament: Hunting for Votes
Author/Authors :
Stuart، Mark نويسنده , , Cowley، Philip نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages :
-257
From page :
258
To page :
0
Abstract :
The government’s main difficulty in the Commons in 2004 came over the passage of the Higher Education Bill. Its eventual (narrow) success was due to four factors: a desire amongst Labour MPs not to damage the government, the inability of the rebels to concentrate their forces; the extensive consultation between front- and backbenchers, and the changes made to the bill to meet the concerns of would-be rebels. Backbench rebellions over a range of other issues meant that the Parliamentary Labour Party maintained its record as one of the most rebellious parliamentary parties in post-war history. The government also suffered a string of defeats in the Lords, where opposition over hunting was only overcome through the use of the Parliament Act. Although widely seen as an example of executive arrogance, this was in reality yet another example of an increasingly assertive Parliament. Also widely misunderstood were the various internal reforms of the Commons.
Keywords :
Aphthona nigriscutis , Leafy spurge flea beetles , Euphorbia esula , Spurgia esulae , IPM , Biological control , Invasive weeds , Endangered species , Aphthona czwalinae , Aphthona lacertosa , Aphthona flava
Journal title :
PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS
Serial Year :
2005
Journal title :
PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS
Record number :
118330
Link To Document :
بازگشت