Title of article
Probability is perfect, but we canʹt elicit it perfectly
Author/Authors
Anthony OʹHagan، نويسنده , , Jeremy E. Oakley، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages
10
From page
239
To page
248
Abstract
There are difficulties with probability as a representation of uncertainty. However, we argue that there is an important distinction between principle and practice. In principle, probability is uniquely appropriate for the representation and quantification of all forms of uncertainty; it is in this sense that we claim that ‘probability is perfect’. In practice, people find it difficult to express their knowledge and beliefs in probabilistic form, so that elicitation of probability distributions is a far from perfect process. We therefore argue that there is no need for alternative theories, but that any practical elicitation of expert knowledge must fully acknowledge imprecision in the resulting distribution.
We outline a recently developed Bayesian technique that allows the imprecision in elicitation to be formulated explicitly, and apply it to some of the challenge problems.
Keywords
Computer codes , Elicitaton , Epistemic probability , Sensitivity analysis , Sources of uncertainty , Uncertainty analysis , Aleatory probability , Bayesian inference
Journal title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Serial Year
2004
Journal title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Record number
1186813
Link To Document