On drop-tower test methodology for blast mitigation seat evaluation

Blast mitigation seats have been employed in armored vehicles to protect occupants from injuries caused by improvised explosive devices (IEDs). Currently, there exist no standard experimental evaluation methods that can be used to fully assess the protection capability of a particular seat design. For historical reasons, drop-towers have been used extensively for such purpose, as a repeatable laboratory method with some limitations. In this paper, the authors developed analytical models to study the difference between results obtained from a drop tower test and those from actual blast events. It was found that the selection of the test method had a significant effect on the results. In particular, it was found that the drop-tower methodology can often overestimate the performance of blast mitigation seats, which can result in the fielding of sub-optimal solutions for the protection of occupants.