Title of article :
Irrigation scheduling strategies based on soil matric potential on yield and fruit quality of mulched-drip irrigated chili pepper in Northwest China
Author/Authors :
Haijun Liu، نويسنده , , Huiying Yang and for the Virahep-C Study Group، نويسنده , , Jianhua Zheng، نويسنده , , Dongdong Jia، نويسنده , , Jun Wang، نويسنده , , Yan Li، نويسنده , , Guanhua Huang، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Pages :
10
From page :
232
To page :
241
Abstract :
A two-year field experiment was conducted with drip irrigation and plastic mulch to investigate an appropriate irrigation management strategy for chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Five treatments, with the soil matric potential (SMP) threshold range of −10 to −50 kPa at intervals of 10 kPa, were applied in this study and are correspondingly referred to as T1 to T5. Leaf area index, plant height, soil water content, yield, and total soluble solids (TSS) were measured, and seasonal crop evapotranspiration (ET), water productivity (WP), and irrigation water productivity (IWP) were computed regularly. Results showed that the differences in leaf area index, plant height, above-ground biomass, and crop yield in treatments T1 though T4 were similar (P > 0.05), but higher (P < 0.05) than those of treatment T5. Irrigation amount and crop ET generally decreased with decreasing SMP threshold. Threshold values with SMPs from −10 kPa to −30 kPa caused a reduction of irrigation amount by 22–43% and crop ET reduction by 11–25%. Higher TSS, larger percentage of marketable fruits, and higher WP and IWP were found for treatments T3 and T4 in both growing seasons. The highest SMP threshold (−10 kPa) and lowest SMP threshold (−50 kPa) greatly reduced the WP and IWP. Therefore, a SMP threshold range of −30 kPa to −40 kPa at 20 cm depth was recommended for irrigation management of chili pepper under mulched-drip irrigation conditions in the arid region of Northwest China.
Keywords :
Capsicum annuum L. , Water productivity , Irrigation water productivity , Crop evapotranspiration , Fruit size distribution
Journal title :
Agricultural Water Management
Serial Year :
2012
Journal title :
Agricultural Water Management
Record number :
1327194
Link To Document :
بازگشت