Title of article :
The Impact of Pituitary Blockage with GnRH Antagonist and Gonadotrophin Stimulation Length on The Outcome of ICSI Cycles in Women Older than 36 Years
Author/Authors :
Santana، Rosane نويسنده Fertility-Assisted Fertilization Center, Av. Brigadeiro Luis Antônio, S?o Paulo, SP, Brazil , , Souza Setti، Amanda نويسنده Sapientiae Institute, Educational and Research Center in Assisted Reproduction, Sao Paulo, Brazil , , Guilherme Maldonado، Luiz نويسنده Fertility-Assisted Fertilization Center, Av. Brigadeiro Luis Antônio, S?o Paulo, SP, Brazil , , Montenegro Valente، Fernanda نويسنده Fertility-Assisted Fertilization Center, Av. Brigadeiro Luis Antônio, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil , , Iaconelli، Carla نويسنده Fertility-Assisted Fertilization Center, Av. Brigadeiro Luis Antônio, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil , , Iaconelli Jr، Assumpto نويسنده Fertility - Assisted Fertilization Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil , , Borges Jr، Edson نويسنده Fertility - Assisted Fertilization Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 30 سال 2014
Pages :
8
From page :
135
To page :
142
Abstract :
Background: The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate whether the length of pituitary blockage with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists or the stimulation period influence intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes in patients older than 36 years of age. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 138 couples with maternal age > 36 years undergoing ICSI with an antagonist protocol were included. The influences of stimulation and suppression length on the response to ovarian stimulation and ICSI outcomes were investigated. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the predictive value of the stimulation period for achievement of implantation and pregnancy. Results: The gonadotrophin stimulation length negatively influenced the implantation rate (RC: -4.200; p=0.023). The area under ROC curve (AUC) could distinguish between women with positive and negative implantation (AUC: 0.611; CI: 0.546-0.673) and pregnancy (AUC: 0.593; CI: 0.528-0.656). The threshold value demonstrated a high negative predictive value on likelihood of implantation (p=0.0032, 90% sensitivity) and pregnancy (p=0.0147, 87.1% sensitivity) when patients underwent more than 10 days of stimulation. Conclusion: The stimulation period negatively influences the implantation rate in women older than 36 years. A stimulation interval greater than 10 days is associated with a negative predictive value for the chance of implantation and pregnancy.
Journal title :
International Journal of Fertility and Sterility
Serial Year :
2014
Journal title :
International Journal of Fertility and Sterility
Record number :
1349215
Link To Document :
بازگشت