Author/Authors :
Shakerian Ghahferokhi، Farshad نويسنده Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center, Shaheed Rajaei Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, , , Ramezani، Marjan نويسنده Resident of Cardiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical and Research Center , , Sanati، Hamid Reza نويسنده Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center, Shaheed Rajaei Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, , , Firouzi، Ata نويسنده Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical and Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. , , Zahedmehr، Ali نويسنده , , Kiani، Reza نويسنده Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical and Research Center , , Aghababaie، Mahdieh نويسنده Cardiologist, Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical and Research Center , , Parchami Ghazaee، Sepideh نويسنده Physiologist Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center, Rajaei Cardiovascular, Medical and Research Center ,
Abstract :
Noninvasive, cheaper, and more feasible methods have always been of great interest to all
investigators and physicians in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. We aimed to investigate the
relationship between chest pain and electrocardiographic findings and the culprit artery diagnosed
by coronary angiography. This study was conducted on 200 patients with a diagnosis of coronary
artery disease who underwent coronary angiography. Electrocardiogram interpretation was assessed
according to the different types of rhythms, ST-T interval changes, and cardiac axis deviations.
According to the coronary angiography findings, the culprit vessel was defined. All the included
patients who experienced chest pain and its characteristics (quality, location, and duration) were
registered on a self-explanatory basis. The correlation between the obtained clinical characteristics
and the culprit vessel was analyzed. Although in all the groups divided according to the involved
coronary vessels heavy chest feeling was the most frequent, differences were insignificant. Most of
the patients with left circumflex artery involvement (p value=0.028) and left anterior descending
artery disease (p value=0.045) experienced epigastric pain. There were no significant differences
between the frequency of patients with sinus and non-sinus rhythm in the groups divided according
to the involved coronary vessels. Patients with ST-T interval changes were more likely to
experience left circumflex artery involvement (p value < 0.001). Axis deviations were markedly
more frequent in patients with right coronary artery (p value < 0.001), left circumflex artery (p
value=0.014), and left anterior descending artery disease (p value=0.040). Electrocardiogram
findings may be helpful but certainly not reliable enough to predict the involved coronary vessel.
There was noconsiderable relationship between chest pain type and culprit artery. Epigastric pain
may be considered a strong marker for coronary artery disease.