Title of article :
Comparison of Early Active and Passive Post-operative Mobilization
Author/Authors :
Layeghi، Fereydoun نويسنده University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran , , Sharafi Farzad، Maryam نويسنده Kawsar Human Genetics Research Center, Medical Genetics Laboratory of Dr. Zeinali, Tehran, Iran ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 16 سال 2012
Abstract :
Objectives: Despite numerous studies, achieving the best outcome is challenging after flexor tendon
repairs in zone 2. This study was done to test the hypothesis that immediate postoperative active
mobilization will achieve similar outcomes to passive mobilization.
Method: Fifty fingers in 38 patients with flexor tendon repair in zone 2 were enrolled in this trial. The
patients were randomly assigned to two groups: Early active mobilization and Passive mobilization. They
were assessed eight weeks post-operatively. Outcomes were defined using ‘Strickland’ and ‘Buck-
Gramcko’ criteria. The analysis was done according to intention-to-treat principles, using imputation for
missing data.
Results: There were significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.001). According to Strickland
criteria, the results were 80% ‘excellent and good’ and 20% ‘fair’ and ‘poor’ in the early active
mobilization group. In the passive mobilization control group results were: 40% ‘excellent and good’ and
44% fair and 16% poor. Mean of total active mobilization was significantly greater in the early active
mobilization group.
Conclusion: The actively mobilized tendon underwent intrinsic healing without large gap formation.
Increased ultimate range of motion confirmed that early active mobilization can be used after strong
repair in zone two.
Journal title :
Iranian Rehabilitation Journal (IRJ)
Journal title :
Iranian Rehabilitation Journal (IRJ)