• Title of article

    Crossflow Sampler Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFIUF)—An alternative Fouling Index

  • Author/Authors

    Lee Nuang Sim، نويسنده , , Yun Ye، نويسنده , , Vicki Chen، نويسنده , , Anthony G. Fane، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
  • Pages
    11
  • From page
    174
  • To page
    184
  • Abstract
    A Fouling Index known as the Crossflow Sampler Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration (CFS-MFIUF) measured under constant flux is developed in this paper. The method involves a specially designed crossflow cell, the permeate of which flows to a dead-end MFI measuring device. This method has both the capability of capturing small foulant particles as well as simulating the crossflow hydrodynamic conditions of an reverse osmosis (RO) module. The traditional fouling indices, such as MFI, are measured using dead-end filtration and the crossflow hydrodynamic conditions in actual RO membrane filtration are not taken into account. In the current study, colloidal silica and humic acid were selected as representatives of a colloidal foulant and macromolecular foulant, respectively. When humic acid was added to the silica colloids, CFS-MFIUF was found to have a linear relationship with the humics concentration, suggesting that CFS-MFIUF is not only sensitive toward colloids, but also to organic matter. In all of the experiments, CFS-MFIUF was compared with the Modified Fouling Index Ultrafiltration constant flux (MFI-UFconst.flux). The results indicated that the conventional MFI-UFconst.flux tends to predict a higher fouling propensity by 10–40% when compared to the CFS-MFIUF. CFS-MFIUF was also tested using seawater and pre-filtered seawater. The CFS-MFIUF shows significant improvement after pre-treatment, but this improvement cannot be detected by MFI-UFconst.flux. Preliminary RO experiments with silica and humic acid mixture solution indicated that CFS-MFIUF was more sensitive to fouling propensity. The CFS-MFIUF predicted transmembrane pressure (TMP) profile agreed well with the actual RO fouling behaviour with only 11% deviation in the absence of salt. While with the salt in the solution, TMP profile predicted based on CFS-MFIUF plus osmosis pressure due to salt alone is unable to match the actual RO fouling behaviour. This indicates the potential contribution of cake enhanced osmosis pressure in RO fouling.
  • Keywords
    Fouling index , Colloidal fouling , Reverse osmosis , Crossflow filtration , Constant flux
  • Journal title
    Journal of Membrane Science
  • Serial Year
    2010
  • Journal title
    Journal of Membrane Science
  • Record number

    1355316