Title of article
M2E2 four-member ring structure, M2(μ-EH2)2(P2)2 (M=Pd or Pt; E=Si or Ge; P2=(PH3)2 or H2PCH2CH2PH2) versus μ-disilene and μ-digermene-bridged structures, M2(μ-E2H4)(P2)2. A theoretical study
Author/Authors
Shigeyoshi Sakaki، نويسنده , , Saori Yamaguchi، نويسنده , , Yasuo Musashi، نويسنده , , Manabu Sugimoto، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
دوفصلنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
Pages
14
From page
173
To page
186
Abstract
M2(EH2)2(P2)2 (M=Pd or Pt; E=Si or Ge; P2=(PH3)2 or diphosphinoethane (H2PCH2CH2PH2; dipe)) was theoretically investigated with the DFT method. Natural bond orbital (nbo) analysis and the laplacian of electron density indicate that Pt2(SiH2)2(P2)2 and Pt2(GeH2)2(P2)2 are characterized to be di(μ-silylene)- and di(μ-germylene)-bridged complexes, respectively, which involve M2Si2 and M2Ge2 four-member ring structures, respectively. In other words, they should be represented as Pt2(μ-SiH2)2(P2)2 and Pt2(μ-GeH2)2(P2)2. On the other hand, the palladium(0) analogs are understood in terms of μ-disilene- and μ-digermene-bridged complexes in which the SiSi and GeGe bonding interactions are maintained. Thus, they should be represented as Pd2(μ-Si2H4)(P2)2 and Pd2(μ-Ge2H4)(P2)2. The difference between platinum(0) and palladium(0) complexes is interpreted in terms of the difference in the strength of π-back donation interaction; in the platinum(0) complex, the π-back donation interaction is so strong that the SiSi and GeGe bonds are almost broken, while in the palladium(0) complex the π-back donation interaction is not so strong and thereby the SiSi and GeGe bonding interactions are still maintained. Also in the mononuclear disilene and digermene complexes, M(E2H4)(P2) (M=Pd or Pt; E=Si or Ge), a similar difference between platinum(0) and palladium(0) complexes is observed; platinum(0) complexes are characterized to be a three-member metallacycle complex which involves an EE single bond and two ME covalent bonds, whereas the palladium(0) analogs are characterized to be the usual disilene and digermene complexes in which the SiSi and GeGe double bonds are maintained. This is because the π-back-donating interaction is stronger in platinum(0) complexes than in palladium(0) complexes. In M(C2H4)(P2) and M2(μ-C2H4)(P2)2, the CC double bond is maintained, since the π-back donation is much weaker than those of Si and Ge analogs even in platinum(0) complexes. Thus, these complexes are characterized to be the ethylene complex in which the CC double bond coordinates with the Pt(0) and Pd(0) centers and not the three-member metallacycle complex.
Keywords
DFT , Silylene , Molecules orbital calculations , Germylene , Platinum , Palladium , ?-Silene , ?-Germene
Journal title
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry
Serial Year
2001
Journal title
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry
Record number
1373263
Link To Document