Title of article :
Evaluation of an in-clinic assay for the diagnosis of canine parvovirus
Author/Authors :
Decaro، نويسنده , , N. and Desario، نويسنده , , C. and Billi، نويسنده , , M. and Lorusso، نويسنده , , E. and Colaianni، نويسنده , , M.L. and Colao، نويسنده , , V. and Elia، نويسنده , , G. and Ventrella، نويسنده , , G. and Kusi، نويسنده , , I. and Bo، نويسنده , , S. and Buonavoglia، نويسنده , , C.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages :
4
From page :
504
To page :
507
Abstract :
The results of a study designed to evaluate the performance of an in-clinic test for the detection of canine parvovirus (CPV) are reported. A total of 150 faecal samples collected from dogs with acute diarrhoea were tested using the in-clinic test, a haemagglutination assay (HA) and a real-time PCR assay for CPV detection, quantification and characterisation. s detected in 66, 73, and 101 faecal samples by in-clinic, HA and PCR testing, respectively. The relative sensitivity and specificity of the in-clinic test were 86.3% and 96.1%, respectively, when the test was compared to HA, and 65.3% and 100%, respectively, when compared to real-time PCR. The sample distribution according to the virus type was CPV-2a, n = 44; CPV-2b, n = 11; CPV-2c, n = 44, CPV-2, n = 2, as determined by minor groove binder probe assays and/or sequence analysis. The percentage of positive in-clinic tests was 70.5% for CPV-2a, 72.7% for CPV-2b and 75.0% for CPV-2c (P > 0.05). Using real-time PCR as the reference standard for CPV detection, the in-clinic test was more specific than HA and had comparable sensitivity to HA, demonstrating detection rates similar to those previously observed for other rapid in-clinic tests. The in-clinic test was also able to detect all CPV types at equivalent rates.
Keywords :
CPV-2c , In-clinic test , diagnosis , Canine parvovirus
Journal title :
The Veterinary Journal
Serial Year :
2013
Journal title :
The Veterinary Journal
Record number :
1398012
Link To Document :
بازگشت