Title of article :
Evaluation of the interfacial work of fracture of glass-ionomer cements bonded to dentin
Author/Authors :
Cheetham، نويسنده , , Joshua J. and Palamara، نويسنده , , Joseph E.A. and Tyas، نويسنده , , Martin J. and Burrow، نويسنده , , Michael F.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Pages :
11
From page :
427
To page :
437
Abstract :
AbstractObjective m of this study was to investigate the interfacial work of fracture of conventional (C-) and resin-modified (RM-) glass-ionomer cements (GICs) bonded to dentin. s ndred and sixty five aries-free human molars were embedded in epoxy resin, sectioned and polished with 300- and 600- grit silicon carbide paper to remove enamel on the occlusal surface. Equilateral triangular-shaped plastic molds (4×4×4×5 mm4) were clamped to the prepared dentin surfaces by a stainless steel test apparatus. Teflon tape was placed under one internal vertex of the mold to create a 0.1-mm notch at the material-dentin interface. Interfacial work of fracture (γwofint) in tensile fracture mode-I (opening) was determined for six C-GIC, three RM-GIC, and two GIC luting cements at a cross-head speed of 0.1 mm/min and a crosshead distance (L) from the interface of 4.3 mm. The debonded surfaces were evaluated for the predominant failure mode. SEM analysis of examples showing interfacial and notch areas was performed. s and Tukeyʹs post hoc test demonstrated the highest mean γwofint value (90.16±16.6 J/m2) of one RM-GIC was significantly different (p<0.05) from the other materials. ‘High viscosity’ GICs achieved lower results with the lowest recorded at 20.4±10.1 J/m2. There was a significant difference observed (p<0.05) between the mean γwofint of luting C-GIC and luting RM-GIC. Although differences were observed between different material mean γwofint, when comparing groups no significant differences (p=0.181) were observed. For all groups, mixed GIC-interface failure (41%) was the most commonly observed, followed by cohesive failure in GIC (25%) and adhesive failure (20%). SEM analysis revealed that specimens generally fractured from the notch initiation point into the GIC or along the dentin–GIC interface. sion the limits of this study, significant differences (p<0.05) were observed in the γwofint between different glass-ionomer materials. The null hypothesis that there is no difference in the γwofint among different glass-ionomer materials bonded to human dentin was rejected. nce current study, the interfacial work of fracture (γwofint) of glass-ionomer adhesive interfaces has been reported using a simple method that can be used to study the fracture mechanics of an adhesive interface without the need for complicated specimen preparation.
Keywords :
Work of fracture , Interfacial work of fracture , Resin-modified glass-ionomer , Conventional glass-ionomer
Journal title :
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Serial Year :
2014
Journal title :
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Record number :
1406280
Link To Document :
بازگشت