• Title of article

    Comparison of freeze drying and spray drying to obtain porous nanostructured granules from nanosized suspensions

  • Author/Authors

    Vicent، نويسنده , , Mَnica and Sلnchez-Archidona، نويسنده , , Enrique and Molina، نويسنده , , Tamara and Nieto، نويسنده , , Mھ Isabel and Moreno، نويسنده , , Rodrigo، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
  • Pages
    10
  • From page
    1019
  • To page
    1028
  • Abstract
    This work studies the spray drying and freeze drying of different nanosized ceramic materials and the physicochemical characteristics of the obtained granules. Colloidal suspensions of alumina, titania, and a 87/13 mixture were studied. The influence of temperature, pressure, nozzle diameter, and solids loading on the morphology and characteristics of dried granules were evaluated. It was demonstrated that these processing parameters have practically no influence, and the only parameter determining the granules characteristics is the solids content of the suspensions, in both processes. Spray drying leads to a monomodal distribution with higher granule size, while freeze drying produces more porous granules, with a bimodal intragranular distribution. The flowability of spray-dried powder is better than that of the freeze-dried powder and suit better the requirements of a feedstock targeted to obtain coatings by plasma thermal spraying whereas freeze drying can produce high porosity, softer granules.
  • Keywords
    A. Suspensions , B. Microstructure-prefiring , B. Porosity , D. Al2O3 , D. TiO2 , A. Drying
  • Journal title
    Journal of the European Ceramic Society
  • Serial Year
    2012
  • Journal title
    Journal of the European Ceramic Society
  • Record number

    1413529