• Title of article

    Randomized, double-blind pilot trial comparing lamotrigine versus citalopram for the treatment of bipolar depression

  • Author/Authors

    Schaffer، نويسنده , , Ayal and Zuker، نويسنده , , Pamela and Levitt، نويسنده , , Anthony، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    95
  • To page
    99
  • Abstract
    Background ainty exists regarding the best approach for treating bipolar depression among patients already receiving a first-line mood stabilizer. The aim of this pilot study was to compare adding a second mood stabilizer or an antidepressant at this treatment decision point. s -week, randomized, double-blind pilot trial comparing the addition of lamotrigine or citalopram for bipolar depressed patients on mood stabilizer medication. Change in depressive symptoms and risk of switch were examined. s subjects were randomized. Each treatment group experienced a significant mean reduction in total MADRS scores (citalopram Δ — 14.2, p = 0.002; lamotrigine Δ — 13.3, p = 0.001), and there was no significant difference between treatment groups (p = 0.78). Total response rates increased from 31.6% at week 6 to 52.6% at week 12. One out of ten patients in each group experienced a switch to hypomania. tions sample size. Lack of a placebo arm. sions s of this small trial suggest that both lamotrigine and citalopram appear to be reasonable choices as add-on acute treatment for bipolar depression, with response rates continuing to rise considerably past 6 weeks of treatment.
  • Keywords
    bipolar disorder , Bipolar depression , Lamotrigine , mood stabilizer , Citalopram , Antidepressant
  • Journal title
    Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Serial Year
    2006
  • Journal title
    Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Record number

    1431611