Patientsʹ perceptions of information received about medication prescribed for bipolar disorder: Implications for informed choice

Background us research suggests that patients are dissatisfied with information provided about medication prescribed for mental illness, but has not identified which aspects of information provision are unsatisfactory. s mbers of the Manic Depression Fellowship (MDF) completed the Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale (SIMS), a validated measure of patientsʹ satisfaction with various aspects of information provision. s ts reported highest dissatisfaction with information about potential problems associated with medication; over 60% of participants reported dissatisfaction with information about the risks of side effects and whether the medication would affect their sex lives. Participants were significantly less satisfied with information about potential problems associated with their medication than people prescribed medication for HIV in a previously reported study (p < .01). Those reporting low adherence to medication had significantly lower satisfaction with information scores than those reporting high adherence (p < .05). tions mple could be prone to selection bias; participants were members of an organisation for people affected by bipolar disorder, whilst the comparator group was a NHS HIV clinic sample. Furthermore, the objective amount and type of information provided was not assessed, therefore the cause of patientsʹ dissatisfaction is not known. sions ved satisfaction with information is low, particularly in relation to possible drug side-effects. Health practitioners need to elicit individualsʹ information requirements and tailor information to meet their needs, in order to facilitate informed choice and adherence to treatment. Moreover, they need to provide information in a manner appropriate for a patientʹs cognitive functioning at different illness phases.