Author/Authors :
Riedel، نويسنده , , Michael and Mِller، نويسنده , , Hans-Jürgen and Obermeier، نويسنده , , Michael and Adli، نويسنده , , Mazda and Bauer، نويسنده , , Michael and Kronmüller، نويسنده , , Klaus and Brieger، نويسنده , , Peter and Laux، نويسنده , , Gerd and Bender، نويسنده , , Wolfram and Heuser، نويسنده , , Isabella and Zeiler، نويسنده , , Joachim and Gaebel، نويسنده , , Wolfgang and Schennach-Wolff، نويسنده , , Rebecca and Henkel، نويسنده , , Verena and Seemüller، نويسنده , , Florian، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Background
redictor analyses search for single predictors or rely on data from randomized controlled trials. We aimed at detecting a set of clinical baseline variables for prediction of response and remission in 1014 naturalistically treated inpatients with major depressive episode treated for 53.62 ± 47.5 days.
s
e-staged procedure was implemented. First, univariate tests were used for finding associations with baseline variables. Second, logistic regression and third-CART analyses were used to determine predictors of response to inpatient treatment.
s
ce of suicidality, a higher initial HAMD-21 total score, an episode length < 24 months, fewer previous hospitalizations, and absence of any ICD-10 F4 comorbidity predicted response in 2 different statistical models. Remission was predicted by lower HAMD-21 baseline score, episode length < 24 months and fewer previous hospitalizations in both models.
tion
s were assessed by a post-hoc analysis, based on prospectively collected data. No controlled study design.
sion
ry to current beliefs, baseline suicidality might be associated with higher chances for response. In addition, baseline severity might impact outcome depending on which criterion (remission or response) used.
Keywords :
Response , Remission , Predictor , Major Depression , Inpatients