Title of article :
Towards the ultimate variance-conserving convection scheme
Author/Authors :
Os، نويسنده , , J.J.A.M.Van and Uittenbogaard، نويسنده , , R.E.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages :
18
From page :
197
To page :
214
Abstract :
In the past various arguments have been used for applying kinetic energy-conserving advection schemes in numerical simulations of incompressible fluid flows. One argument is obeying the programmed dissipation by viscous stresses or by sub-grid stresses in Direct Numerical Simulation and Large Eddy Simulation, see e.g. [Phys. Fluids A 3 (7) (1991) 1766]. Another argument is that, according to e.g. [J. Comput. Phys. 6 (1970) 392; 1 (1966) 119], energy-conserving convection schemes are more stable i.e. by prohibiting a spurious blow-up of volume-integrated energy in a closed volume without external energy sources. In the above-mentioned references it is stated that nonlinear instability is due to spatial truncation rather than to time truncation and therefore these papers are mainly concerned with the spatial integration. In this paper we demonstrate that discretized temporal integration of a spatially variance-conserving convection scheme can induce non-energy conserving solutions. In this paper the conservation of the variance of a scalar property is taken as a simple model for the conservation of kinetic energy. In addition, the derivation and testing of a variance-conserving scheme allows for a clear definition of kinetic energy-conserving advection schemes for solving the Navier–Stokes equations. Consequently, we first derive and test a strictly variance-conserving space–time discretization for the convection term in the convection–diffusion equation. Our starting point is the variance-conserving spatial discretization of the convection operator presented by Piacsek and Williams [J. Comput. Phys. 6 (1970) 392]. In terms of its conservation properties, our variance-conserving scheme is compared to other spatially variance-conserving schemes as well as with the non-variance-conserving schemes applied in our shallow-water solver, see e.g. [Direct and Large-eddy Simulation Workshop IV, ERCOFTAC Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, pp. 409–287].
Keywords :
Variance-conserving , Convection scheme , kinetic energy , 2D , Crank–Nicolson , Conservation , Variance , Scalar transport
Journal title :
Journal of Computational Physics
Serial Year :
2004
Journal title :
Journal of Computational Physics
Record number :
1477968
Link To Document :
بازگشت