Title of article :
A quantitative comparison between and elements for solving the Cahn–Hilliard equation
Author/Authors :
Zhang، نويسنده , , Liangzhe and Tonks، نويسنده , , Michael R. and Gaston، نويسنده , , Derek and Peterson، نويسنده , , John W. and Andrs، نويسنده , , David and Millett، نويسنده , , Paul C. and Biner، نويسنده , , Bulent S.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Abstract :
The Cahn–Hilliard (CH) equation is a time-dependent fourth-order partial differential equation (PDE). When solving the CH equation via the finite element method (FEM), the domain is discretized by C 1 -continuous basis functions or the equation is split into a pair of second-order PDEs, and discretized via C 0 -continuous basis functions. In the current work, a quantitative comparison between C 1 Hermite and C 0 Lagrange elements is carried out using a continuous Galerkin FEM formulation. The different discretizations are evaluated using the method of manufactured solutions solved with Newton’s method and Jacobian-Free Newton Krylov. It is found that the use of linear Lagrange elements provides the fastest computation time for a given number of elements, while the use of cubic Hermite elements provides the lowest error. The results offer a set of benchmarks to consider when choosing basis functions to solve the CH equation. In addition, an example of microstructure evolution demonstrates the different types of elements for a traditional phase-field model.
Keywords :
FEM , Cahn–Hilliard equation , accuracy , JFNK , Computational time
Journal title :
Journal of Computational Physics
Journal title :
Journal of Computational Physics