Title of article
A comparison of self-reported puberty using the Pubertal Development Scale and the Sexual Maturation Scale in a school-based epidemiologic survey
Author/Authors
Bond، نويسنده , , Lyndal and Clements، نويسنده , , Jackie and Bertalli، نويسنده , , Nadine and Evans-Whipp، نويسنده , , Tracy and McMorris، نويسنده , , Barbara J. and Patton، نويسنده , , George C. and Toumbourou، نويسنده , , John W. and Catalano، نويسنده , , Richard F.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
دوماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages
12
From page
709
To page
720
Abstract
Purpose
mine concordance between two self-reported measures of puberty: Sexual Maturation Scale (SMS) and Pubertal Development Scale (PDS) and their acceptability to adolescents.
s
ipants of a school-based study in grades 5, 7 and 9 were classified into one of 5 pubertal stages using each method.
s
tudents (age 9–16 years) participated. Agreement was moderate for males ( κ 0.42, 95% CI 0.39, 0.45) and females ( κ 0.57, 95% CI 0.53, 0.61). Concordance within one stage was excellent (females 97%, males 89%), with discrepancies due to females being classified one stage later on the PDS (26%) and males one stage earlier (32%). There were more missing data for the SMS (13%) than the PDS (4%).
sions
the level of concordance and difficulties of using the drawings in a school-based survey, we would recommend the PDS as an alternative to assess pubertal status in epidemiological studies.
Keywords
Adolescence puberty measurement epidemiology
Journal title
Journal of Adolescence
Serial Year
2006
Journal title
Journal of Adolescence
Record number
1494983
Link To Document