Title of article :
Comparison of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography and gas chromatography – mass spectrometry for the characterization of complex hydrocarbon mixtures
Author/Authors :
Schoenmakers، نويسنده , , Peter J. and Oomen، نويسنده , , Jeroen L.M.M. and Blomberg، نويسنده , , Jan and Genuit، نويسنده , , Wim and van Velzen، نويسنده , , Ger، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
Abstract :
In this paper, we compare the current separation power of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) with the potential separation power of GC–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) systems. Using simulated data, we may envisage a GC–MS contour plot, that can be compared with a GC×GC chromatogram. Real examples are used to demonstrate the current potential of the two techniques in the field of hydrocarbon analysis. As a separation technique for complex hydrocarbon mixtures, GC×GC is currently about as powerful as GC–MS is potentially powerful. GC–MS has not reached its potential separation power in this area, because a universal, soft ionization method does not exist. The greatest advantage of GC×GC is, however, its potential for quantitative analysis. Because flame-ionisation detection can be used, quantitative analysis by GC×GC is much more robust, reliable and reproducible.
Keywords :
Hydrocarbons , alkenes , alkanes
Journal title :
Journal of Chromatography A
Journal title :
Journal of Chromatography A