• Title of article

    Cement manufacturing using alternative fuels and the advantages of process modelling

  • Author/Authors

    Kننntee، نويسنده , , U. and Zevenhoven، نويسنده , , R. and Backman، نويسنده , , R. and Hupa، نويسنده , , M.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
  • Pages
    9
  • From page
    293
  • To page
    301
  • Abstract
    Energy costs and environmental standards encouraged cement manufacturers world-wide to evaluate to what extent conventional fuels can be replaced by alternative fuels, i.e., processed waste materials. Clinker burning is well suited for various alternative fuels. In order select a suitable alternative fuel, a commercial modelling tool (ASPEN PLUS®) is used to model the four-stage pre-heater kiln system of a full-scale cement plant (clinker production ∼2900 tons/day), using petcoke as fuel. The goal is to optimise process control and alternative fuel consumption, while maintaining clinker product quality. Calculations with varying amounts of different fuels are compared with a reference case. The dependence of process performance on the amount of combustion air is clearly demonstrated and the energy demand of the process could be predicted for varying fuel mixes.
  • Keywords
    Cement clinker , Alternative fuels , Process modelling
  • Journal title
    Fuel Processing Technology
  • Serial Year
    2004
  • Journal title
    Fuel Processing Technology
  • Record number

    1506832