• Title of article

    Comparison of QuEChERS sample preparation methods for the analysis of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables

  • Author/Authors

    Lehotay، نويسنده , , Steven J. and Son، نويسنده , , Kyung Ae and Kwon، نويسنده , , Hyeyoung and Koesukwiwat، نويسنده , , Urairat and Fu، نويسنده , , Wusheng and Mastovska، نويسنده , , Katerina and Hoh، نويسنده , , Eunha and Leepipatpiboon، نويسنده , , Natchanun، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
  • Pages
    13
  • From page
    2548
  • To page
    2560
  • Abstract
    This article describes the comparison of different versions of an easy, rapid and low-cost sample preparation approach for the determination of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables by concurrent use of gas and liquid chromatography (GC and LC) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) for detection. The sample preparation approach is known as QuEChERS, which stands for “quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe”. The three compared versions were based on the original unbuffered method, which was first published in 2003, and two interlaboratory validated versions: AOAC Official Method 2007.01, which uses acetate buffering, and European Committee for Standardization (CEN) Standard Method EN 15662, which calls for citrate buffering. LC–MS/MS and GC–MS analyses using each method were tested from 50 to 1000 ng/g in apple–blueberry sauce, peas and limes spiked with 32 representative pesticides. As expected, the results were excellent (overall average of 98% recoveries with 10% RSD) using all 3 versions, except the unbuffered method gave somewhat lower recoveries for the few pH-dependent pesticides. The different methods worked equally well for all matrices tested with equivalent amounts of matrix co-extractives measured, matrix effects on quantification and chemical noise from matrix in the chromatographic backgrounds. The acetate-buffered version gave higher and more consistent recoveries for pymetrozine than the other versions in all 3 matrices and for thiabendazole in limes. None of the versions consistently worked well for chlorothalonil, folpet or tolylfluanid in peas, but the acetate-buffered method gave better results for screening of those pesticides. Also, due to the recent shortage in acetonitrile (MeCN), ethyl acetate (EtOAc) was evaluated as a substitute solvent in the acetate-buffered QuEChERS version, but it generally led to less clean extracts and lower recoveries of pymetrozine, thiabendazole, acephate, methamidophos, omethoate and dimethoate. In summary, the acetate-buffered version of QuEChERS using MeCN exhibited advantages compared to the other tested methods in the study.
  • Keywords
    mass spectrometry , QuEChERS , Pesticide residue analysis , Gas chromatography , Sample preparation , fruits and vegetables , Liquid chromatography
  • Journal title
    Journal of Chromatography A
  • Serial Year
    2010
  • Journal title
    Journal of Chromatography A
  • Record number

    1512967