Title of article
Liquid chromatography–nuclear magnetic resonance coupling as alternative to liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry hyphenations: Curious option or powerful and complementary routine tool?
Author/Authors
Sturm، نويسنده , , Sonja and Seger، نويسنده , , Christoph، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Pages
12
From page
50
To page
61
Abstract
Combining the most powerful separation techniques, i.e. liquid chromatography (LC) or capillary electrophoresis (CE) with a information rich detection system – the mass spectrometer or the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrometer – has been pursued for more than three decades. This compilation shall provide an overview of the advantages and limitations of the LC–NMR hyphenation in the light of its most valued application–the unequivocal analyte identification. Especially the post LC trapping of analytes with an in-line solid phase extraction (SPE) device prior to transferring the analyte of interest to the NMR spectrometer (LC–SPE–NMR) proved to be a robust installation allowing a significant cut-down of the amount of analyte needed for the generation of high quality heteronuclear NMR shift correlation data. Different available technical realizations will be discussed and typical application examples from natural product research and from industrial settings will be given.
Keywords
Structure elucidation , Phytochemistry , Impurity analysis , Liquid chromatography nuclear magnetic resonance (LC–NMR) , Liquid chromatography–solid-phase extraction–nuclear magnetic resonance (LC–SPE–NMR) , Capillary nuclear magnetic resonance (cap-NMR)
Journal title
Journal of Chromatography A
Serial Year
2012
Journal title
Journal of Chromatography A
Record number
1516609
Link To Document