Title of article :
Efficient separation of oxidized cello-oligosaccharides generated by cellulose degrading lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases
Author/Authors :
Westereng، نويسنده , , Bjّrge and Agger، نويسنده , , Jane Wittrup and Horn، نويسنده , , Svein J. and Vaaje-Kolstad، نويسنده , , Gustav and Aachmann، نويسنده , , Finn L. and Stenstrّm، نويسنده , , Yngve H. and Eijsink، نويسنده , , Vincent G.H. Eijsink، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Abstract :
We present an evaluation of HPLC-based analytical tools for the simultaneous analysis of native and oxidized cello-oligosaccharides, which are products of enzymatic cellulose degradation. Whereas cello-oligosaccharides arise from cellulose depolymerization by glycoside hydrolases, oxidized cello-oligosaccharides are produced by cellobiose dehydrogenase and the recently identified copper dependent lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) currently classified as CBM33 and GH61. The latter enzymes are wide-spread and expected to play crucial roles in further development of efficient enzyme technology for biomass conversion. Three HPLC approaches with well documented performance in the field of oligosaccharide analysis have been investigated: high-performance anion-exchange chromatography (HPAEC), hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) and porous graphitized carbon liquid chromatography (PGC-LC). HPAEC with pulsed amperometric detection (PAD) was superior for analysis of oxidized oligosaccharides, combining the best separation with superior sensitivity for oligosaccharide species with a degree of polymerization (DP) ranging from 1 to 10. Furthermore, the HPAEC method can be optimized for operation in a high-throughput manner (run time 10 min). Both PGC-LC and HILIC allow reasonable run times (41 and 25 min, respectively), with acceptable separation, but suffer from poor sensitivity compared to HPAEC-PAD. On the other hand, PGC-LC and HILIC benefit from being fully compatible with online mass spectrometry. Using an LC–MS setup, these methods will deliver much better sensitivity than what can be obtained with conventional detectors such as ultraviolet-, charged aerosol-, or evaporative light scattering and may reach sensitivities similar to or even better than what is obtained in HPAEC-PAD. Pure oxidized cello-oligosaccharide standards, ranging from DP2 to DP5, were obtained by semi-preparative PGC and characterized by MS and NMR analysis.
Keywords :
Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) , Porous graphitized carbon liquid chromatography (PGC-LC) , biofuel , Cellulose aldonic acids , High-performance anion-exchange chromatography (HPAEC) , Lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase (LPMO)
Journal title :
Journal of Chromatography A
Journal title :
Journal of Chromatography A