Title of article :
The Logic of Contrition
Author/Authors :
Maarten C. Boerlijst، نويسنده , , Maarten C. and Nowak، نويسنده , , Martin A. and Sigmund، نويسنده , , Karl، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1997
Pages :
13
From page :
281
To page :
293
Abstract :
A highly successful strategy for the Repeated Prisonerʹs Dilemma is Contrite Tit For Tat, which bases its decisions on the “standings” of the two players. This strategy is as good as Tit For Tat at invading populations of defectors, and much better at overcoming errors in implementation against players who are also using it. However, it is vulnerable to errors in perception. In this paper, we discuss the merits of Contrite Tit For Tat and compare it with other strategies, like Pavlov and the newly-introduced Remorse. We embed these strategies into an eight-dimensional space of stochastic strategies which we investigate by analytical means and numerical simulations. Finally, we show that if one replaces the conventions concerning the “standing” by other, even simpler conventions, one obtains an evolutionarily stable strategy (called Prudent Pavlov) which is immune against both mis-perception and mis-implementation.
Journal title :
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Serial Year :
1997
Journal title :
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Record number :
1533168
Link To Document :
بازگشت