The Survival of Slow Reproducers

Multicellularity, and the attendant segregation of the germ line, entails the loss of reproductive capacity by the soma: in Volvox carteri, less than 1 cell in 100 contributes to the next generation. However, compensatory advantages are unlikely to be very large (Koufopanou & Bell, 1993. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B)254 ,107–113). Somewhat similarly, sex implies the generation of males, hence a dramatic reproductive slowdown (Barton & Charlesworth, 1998. Science281, 1986–1990); yet, a compensating (two-fold) advantage of sex has not been found. Here, I try to evaluate the actual cost of maintaining slow reproductive cycles, namely cycles that necessitate the production of “dead end” units such as somatic cells or males. In a quantitative model for the competition of individuals with different, heritable reproductive rates, this cost turns out to be unexpectedly small, and may even sometimes become irrelevant. The bases for this are made fairly clear: thus, when all enjoy high fecundity (e.g. a long reproductive life) the handicap of a slower reproduction vanishes; alternatively, a slight separation of ecological niches may be sufficient for survival of slower but otherwise unchanged reproducers; and finally, inherent to slow reproduction is a low rate of destabilizing genetic change. These facts are largely independent of the formal model details, and are supported by direct computer simulations. They give a quantitative basis for analysing the evolution and prevalence of slow life cycles. The implications of these findings for the evolution of multicellularity are briefly discussed.