The power of tests of predictive ability in the presence of structural breaks

This paper presents analytical, Monte Carlo, and empirical evidence on the effects of structural breaks on tests for equal forecast accuracy and encompassing. We show that out-of-sample predictive content can be hard to find because out-of-sample tests are highly dependent on the timing of the predictive ability. Moreover, predictive content is harder to find with some tests than others: in power, F-type tests of equal forecast accuracy and encompassing often dominate t-type alternatives. Based on these results and evidence from an empirical application, we conclude that structural breaks under the alternative may explain why researchers often find evidence of in-sample, but not out-of-sample, predictive content.