Title of article
The Cassini Mission probabilistic risk analysis: Comparison of two probabilistic dynamic methodologies
Author/Authors
Swaminathan، نويسنده , , S. and Van-Halle، نويسنده , , J.-Y. and Smidts، نويسنده , , Carol and Mosleh، نويسنده , , Ali and Bell، نويسنده , , Steve and Rudolph، نويسنده , , L.Kevin and Mulvihill، نويسنده , , Robert J. and Bream، نويسنده , , Bruce، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1997
Pages
14
From page
1
To page
14
Abstract
This paper describes a comparison between two dynamic methodologies used in the probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) of the Cassini Mission. The main Cassini PRA was performed by Lockheed Martin. A combination of Monte Carlo algorithms and event-tree logic was used to perform the study. Results were validated using an alternative method, the Discrete Dynamic Event Tree (DDET) methodology.
jor conclusions of the paper are 1) performing a dynamic PRA of large scale ‘real-life’ systems is feasible and 2) given the same ground rules and assumptions, two dynamic methodologies would give the same results.
Journal title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Serial Year
1997
Journal title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Record number
1570517
Link To Document