Title of article
Overall strategy for risk evaluation and priority setting of risk regulations
Author/Authors
Hokstad، نويسنده , , Per and Steiro، نويسنده , , Trygve، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
Pages
12
From page
100
To page
111
Abstract
This paper presents the framework of an approach to support planning and priority setting for risk control. Such an approach could assist government/regulatory authorities in their allocation of resources among different sectors. The term risk will here be used in a very wide sense, and it will include, but not restrict to, the traditional HES (Health, Environment and Safety) concept. An overall classification of risk (‘loss categories’), to be used across sectors and directorates is suggested. The risk evaluation includes a number of factors not accounted for in a standard risk assessment, but should be taken into account when authorities set priorities regarding risk control. Sociological, psychological and ethical perspectives are included, and the need for a discourse during the decision process is pinpointed. The paper also discusses the potential inclusion of cost benefit analyses in such an approach. The indicated approach is denoted Risk Across Sectors (RAS), and suggestions regarding the process to implement it are given. Such an implementation process will by itself increase the knowledge and competence of the involved parties.
Keywords
Vulnerability , Regulations , HES , Risk control , ETHICS , Risk across sectors , RAS , Safety , health , Discourse , environment
Journal title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Serial Year
2006
Journal title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Record number
1571547
Link To Document