Title of article :
European policies in West Africa: who benefits from fisheries agreements?
Author/Authors :
Kaczynski، نويسنده , , Vlad M. and Fluharty، نويسنده , , David L.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
دوماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Pages :
19
From page :
75
To page :
93
Abstract :
Fishery cooperation agreements with the Sub-Saharan West African coastal states are considered by the European Union as purely commercial deals that are designed to maximize access to coastal state fishery resources, secure employment for European harvesting and processing industries and supply European seafood consumption markets at the lowest possible cost. ial compensation paid by Brussels to the West African countries for fishing rights covers two-thirds or more of the license fees and is a subsidy for European vessel owners. This subsidy puts EU in position of a preferred user of the coastal resources. That displaces foreign investors and local entrepreneurs in the coastal states, distorts economics of the European fishing enterprises and promotes excessive pressure on the resources that greatly harms the marine environment in the West African region. is of EUʹs relations with Guinea-Bissau shows that together with manipulation of the size of fishing fleet used by EU in this countryʹs waters, there were significant irregularities resulting from excessive by-catch, underpayment of tuna license fees and denial of timely statistical information for the coastal state. uation of this type of relations with Sub-Saharan West Africa is against the long-term interests of the coastal states and sustainability of the coastal resources. Unless significant changes in fishing policies of the EU are made, West African coastal countries will face severe overexploitation of their resources and subsequent drop in license revenues. The EUʹs departure from purely business approach in fisheries relations with the West African coastal countries and termination of subsidization of the European fleets should be considered as important steps toward new fisheries relations with the region er hand, coastal states should undertake more coordinated approach in dealing with foreign pressures on their resources and harmonize negotiation of the fisheries agreements with the EU. They also must improve the investment climate so foreign fleet operators would be encouraged to integrate their offshore activity with the coastal states’ economies.
Journal title :
Marine Policy
Serial Year :
2002
Journal title :
Marine Policy
Record number :
1586814
Link To Document :
بازگشت