Author/Authors :
Prasad، نويسنده , , M. Hari and Gera، نويسنده , , B. and Thangamani، نويسنده , , I. and Rastogi، نويسنده , , R. and Gopika، نويسنده , , V. and Verma، نويسنده , , V. and Mukhopadhyay، نويسنده , , D. and Bhasin، نويسنده , , V. and Chatterjee، نويسنده , , B. and Sanyasi Rao، نويسنده , , V.V.S. and Lele، نويسنده , , H.G. and Ghosh، نويسنده , , A.K.، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
In nuclear reactor probabilistic safety analyses (PSAs), risk is usually defined by the frequency and magnitude of radioactive releases to the environment (Generic CANDU, 2002). An integrated Level-1, -2 and -3 PSA have been carried out for thorium based natural circulation driven advanced heavy water reactor (AHWR). A Level-1 PSA models accident sequences up to the point at which the reactor core either reaches a stable condition or becomes severely damaged, releasing large amounts of radionuclides into the containment. The probabilistic aspects of the analysis focus on the performance and reliability of nuclear plant systems and station staff in response to plant upsets. A Level-2 PSA examines severe reactor accidents through a combination of probabilistic and deterministic approaches, in order to determine the release of radionuclides from containment, including the physical processes that are involved in the loss of structural integrity of the reactor core (Generic CANDU, 2002). A Level-3 PSA goes through the short and long term (radiological) effects on the public (Fullwood, 2000). In this study the risk associated with internal events is only addressed. In the first phase, Level-1 PSA has been carried out to identify postulated initiating events (PIEs) which may lead to severe core damage (SCD) for the reactor. In the second phase, a Level-2 PSA examines two enveloping severe accidents through a combination of probabilistic and deterministic approaches and determines the release of radionuclides from containment. In the third phase, a Level-3 PSA is carried out for the transport of radionuclides through the environment and for the evaluation of public health risk for the two scenarios considered. The salient findings are presented in the paper.