Title of article :
Sulphuric acid resistance of plain, polymer modified, and fly ash cement concretes
Author/Authors :
Pacheco-Torgal، نويسنده , , F. and Jalali، نويسنده , , Said، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages :
7
From page :
3485
To page :
3491
Abstract :
Classic approaches to polymer-modificated Portland cement based materials usually forget the specific nature of the precast concrete industry and also the economic impacts of each technical option. This manuscript report results of a wider investigation which aims to understand what is the best option for the concrete pipe industry as far as sulphuric acid resistant is concerned, polymer addition or polymer impregnation. Results show that the use of polymer addition it is not economically attractive when compared to polymer impregnation. The increase of costs per meter of pipe is too high. The use of polymer impregnation enhances the chemical resistance of concrete considerably. Furthermore, it is economically viable, especially for smaller diameters. Results also show that using sulphate resistant cements improve the chemical resistance without cost increase.
Keywords :
Precast Concrete , Polymer , IMPREGNATION , Addition , Sulphate resistant cement , Sulphuric Acid , Concrete , Fly ash , Styrene–butadiene , Melamine
Journal title :
Construction and Building Materials
Serial Year :
2009
Journal title :
Construction and Building Materials
Record number :
1629906
Link To Document :
بازگشت