Title of article :
Leaf area index estimation with MODIS reflectance time series and model inversion during full rotations of Eucalyptus plantations
Author/Authors :
le Maire، نويسنده , , Guerric and Marsden، نويسنده , , Claire and Verhoef، نويسنده , , Wouter and Ponzoni، نويسنده , , Flلvio Jorge and Lo Seen، نويسنده , , Danny and Bégué، نويسنده , , Agnès and Stape، نويسنده , , José-Luiz and Nouvellon، نويسنده , , Yann، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
Pages :
14
From page :
586
To page :
599
Abstract :
The leaf area index (LAI) of fast-growing Eucalyptus plantations is highly dynamic both seasonally and inter-annually, and is spatially variable depending on pedo-climatic conditions. LAI is very important in determining the carbon and water balance of a stand, but is difficult to measure during a complete stand rotation and at large scales. Remote-sensing methods allowing the retrieval of LAI time series with accuracy and precision are therefore necessary. Here, we tested two methods for LAI estimation from MODIS 250m resolution red and near-infrared (NIR) reflectance time series. The first method involved the inversion of a coupled model of leaf reflectance and transmittance (PROSPECT4), soil reflectance (SOILSPECT) and canopy radiative transfer (4SAIL2). Model parameters other than the LAI were either fixed to measured constant values, or allowed to vary seasonally and/or with stand age according to trends observed in field measurements. The LAI was assumed to vary throughout the rotation following a series of alternately increasing and decreasing sigmoid curves. The parameters of each sigmoid curve that allowed the best fit of simulated canopy reflectance to MODIS red and NIR reflectance data were obtained by minimization techniques. The second method was based on a linear relationship between the LAI and values of the GEneralized Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (GESAVI), which was calibrated using destructive LAI measurements made at two seasons, on Eucalyptus stands of different ages and productivity levels. The ability of each approach to reproduce field-measured LAI values was assessed, and uncertainty on results and parameter sensitivities were examined. Both methods offered a good fit between measured and estimated LAI (R2 = 0.80 and R2 = 0.62 for model inversion and GESAVI-based methods, respectively), but the GESAVI-based method overestimated the LAI at young ages.
Keywords :
CBERS , leaf area index , Remote sensing , Radiative transfer model , PROSAIL , GESAVI , Eucalypt , MOD13Q1
Journal title :
Remote Sensing of Environment
Serial Year :
2011
Journal title :
Remote Sensing of Environment
Record number :
1630465
Link To Document :
بازگشت