Title of article :
Quantification of copper and zinc species fractions in legume seeds extracts by SEC/ICP-MS: validation and uncertainty estimation
Author/Authors :
Mestek، نويسنده , , Oto and Kom??nkov?، نويسنده , , Jana and Kopl??k، نويسنده , , Richard and Borkov?، نويسنده , , Markéta and Such?nek، نويسنده , , Miloslav، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Pages :
10
From page :
1133
To page :
1142
Abstract :
Fractions of Cu and Zn species in legume samples (common white bean, pea, chick pea and lentil seeds and defatted soybean flour) were analysed by on-line hyphenation of size exclusion chromatography and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Samples were extracted by 0.02 mol l−1 Tris–HCl buffer solution, pH 7.5. The extraction efficiency lay in the region 60–90 and 60–80% for Cu and Zn, respectively. Quantification of elements in the individual chromatographic fractions was carried out by isotope dilution (ID) and external calibration (EC) techniques. For ID analysis the chromatographic effluent was mixed with the flow of 65Cu and 68Zn isotope enriched solution and the isotope ratio values 63Cu/65Cu and (64Zn+66Zn)/68Zn were measured. In the case of EC technique calibration solutions of elements were injected to the flow of mobile phase by the second injector. Prior entering detector the effluent was mixed with the flow of internal standard solution (In, 50 μg l−1). Both methods have similar precision, however the behaviour of both studied elements was not the same. The chromatographic analysis itself was the main source of variability in the case of Cu. For Zn species analysis, the extraction process and the manipulation with the extract, played the significant role too. It was probably caused by lower stability of the present zinc chelates. The total amounts of Zn found in all chromatographic fractions represented 85–95% of Zn in sampled extract whereas those of Cu approached 100%. In case of small peaks the results of ID and EC were not the same. The EC results were lower then ID results. The great deal of results uncertainty accounts for the precision.
Keywords :
uncertainty , Speciation , Validation , legumes
Journal title :
Talanta
Serial Year :
2002
Journal title :
Talanta
Record number :
1642847
Link To Document :
بازگشت