Author/Authors :
Burton، Paul نويسنده Urban Research Program, Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Gold Coast campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia , , Whitty ، Jennifer A. نويسنده School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia , , Kendall، Elizabeth A. نويسنده , , Ratcliffe، Julie نويسنده Flinders Health Economics Group, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia , , Wilson، Andrew نويسنده Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia , , Littlejohns، Peter نويسنده Division of Health and Social Care Research, King’s College School of Medicine, London, UK , , Scuffham، Paul A. نويسنده Centre for Applied Health Economics, Population and Social Health Research Program, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Logan campus, University Drive, Meadowbrook, Queensland, Australia ,
Abstract :
The commentary on our paper from Boaz et al. is both welcome and pertinent, especially in its call for greater critical attention to be paid to some of the underlying principles of participation as well as to techniques and methods (1,2). In some respects our paper and subsequent research was designed to allow us to measure and better understand the impact of participating in a citizen’s jury on the jurors’ views and expressed preferences (1,3).
