Title of article
Comparison of reactant and analyte ions for 63Nickel, corona discharge, and secondary electrospray ionization sources with ion mobility-mass spectrometry
Author/Authors
Crawford، نويسنده , , C.L. and Hill، نويسنده , , H.H.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages
8
From page
225
To page
232
Abstract
63Nickel radioactive ionization (63Ni) is the most common and widely used ion source for ion mobility spectrometry (IMS). Regulatory, financial, and operational concerns with this source have promoted recent development of non-radioactive sources, such as corona discharge ionization (CD), for stand-alone IMS systems. However, there has been no comparison of the negative ion species produced by all three sources in the literature. This study compares the negative reactant and analyte ions produced by three sources on an ion mobility-mass spectrometer: conventional 63Ni, CD, and secondary electrospray ionization (SESI). Results showed that 63Ni and SESI produced the same reactant ion species while CD produced only the nitrate monomer and dimer ions. The analyte ions produced by each ion source were the same except for the CD source which produced a different ion species for the explosive RDX than either the 63Ni or SESI source. Accurate and reproducible reduced mobility (K0) values, including several values reported here for the first time, were found for each explosive with each ion source. Overall, the SESI source most closely reproduced the reactant ion species and analyte ion species profiles for 63Ni. This source may serve as a non-radioactive, robust, and flexible alternative for 63Ni.
Keywords
Corona discharge , Secondary electrospray , Ion mobility spectrometry , mass spectrometry , Ionization , Reactant ion chemistry , 63Nickel
Journal title
Talanta
Serial Year
2013
Journal title
Talanta
Record number
1667290
Link To Document