• Title of article

    Comparing compact codebooks for visual categorization

  • Author/Authors

    van Gemert، نويسنده , , Jan C. and Snoek، نويسنده , , Cees G.M. and Veenman، نويسنده , , Cor J. and Smeulders، نويسنده , , Arnold W.M. and Geusebroek، نويسنده , , Jan-Mark، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
  • Pages
    13
  • From page
    450
  • To page
    462
  • Abstract
    In the face of current large-scale video libraries, the practical applicability of content-based indexing algorithms is constrained by their efficiency. This paper strives for efficient large-scale video indexing by comparing various visual-based concept categorization techniques. In visual categorization, the popular codebook model has shown excellent categorization performance. The codebook model represents continuous visual features by discrete prototypes predefined in a vocabulary. The vocabulary size has a major impact on categorization efficiency, where a more compact vocabulary is more efficient. However, smaller vocabularies typically score lower on classification performance than larger vocabularies. This paper compares four approaches to achieve a compact codebook vocabulary while retaining categorization performance. For these four methods, we investigate the trade-off between codebook compactness and categorization performance. We evaluate the methods on more than 200 h of challenging video data with as many as 101 semantic concepts. The results allow us to create a taxonomy of the four methods based on their efficiency and categorization performance.
  • Keywords
    Video retrieval evaluation , Efficient retrieval , Content analysis and indexing , Concept categorization , BENCHMARKING
  • Journal title
    Computer Vision and Image Understanding
  • Serial Year
    2010
  • Journal title
    Computer Vision and Image Understanding
  • Record number

    1695855