• Title of article

    The influence of forensic evidence on the case outcomes of homicide incidents

  • Author/Authors

    Baskin، نويسنده , , Deborah and Sommers، نويسنده , , Ira، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
  • Pages
    9
  • From page
    1141
  • To page
    1149
  • Abstract
    Objective te of the growth of forensic science services little published research exists related to the impact of forensic evidence on criminal case outcomes. The present study focused on the influence of forensic evidence on the case processing of homicide incidents. als and Methods udy utilized a prospective analysis of official record data that followed homicide cases in five jurisdictions from the time of police incident report to final criminal disposition. s sults showed that most homicides went unsolved (34.5% conviction rate). Only 55.5% of the 400 homicide incidents resulted in arrest of which 77% were referred to the district attorney. On the other hand, 94% of cases referred to the district attorney were charged. Cases were more likely to have arrests, referrals, and charges when witnesses provided information to the police. Suspects who knew their victims were more likely to be arrested and referred to the district attorney. Homicides committed with firearms were less likely to be cleared. The most noteworthy finding was that none of the forensic evidence variables significantly influenced criminal justice outcomes. sions udy results suggest that forensic evidence is auxiliary and non-determinative for homicide cases.
  • Journal title
    Journal of Criminal Justice
  • Serial Year
    2010
  • Journal title
    Journal of Criminal Justice
  • Record number

    1707265