Comparing emulsion polymerization of methacrylate-monomers with different hydrophilicity

A comprehensive experimental study concerning the influence of various types of initiator–emulsifier systems on emulsion polymerization of methacrylate monomers (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), methyl methacrylate (MMA) and butyl methacrylate (BMA)) reveals interesting relations between initiator and surfactant hydrophilicity on the one hand and the hydrophilicity of the monomers on the other hand. For the water-soluble HEMA stable latexes are only obtained if hydrophobic initiators such as 2,2′-azobisisobutyronitrile or dibenzoyl peroxide in combination with alkyl sulfate surfactants with carbon chain lengths greater than 10 or surface active initiators of the 2,2′-azobis(N-2′-methylpropanoyl-2-amino-alkyl-1)-sulfonate type with alkyl chain lengths greater than 8 are employed. Stable nano size range poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) particles have been prepared also by batch emulsion polymerization using ionic surface active initiators (inisurfs). The results clearly show that the formation of stable latex particles requires a proper choice of the initiator–emulsifier system regarding its hydrophilic–hydrophobic balance. The PHEMA particles prepared with surface-active initiators keep their identity and spherical shape even in the dried state whereas in the case of the other initiator–emulsifier systems complete coagulation and coalescence occurs during drying.