Title of article
BioSecure signature evaluation campaign (BSECʹ2009): Evaluating online signature algorithms depending on the quality of signatures
Author/Authors
Houmani، نويسنده , , N. and Mayoue، نويسنده , , A. and Garcia-Salicetti، نويسنده , , S. and Dorizzi، نويسنده , , B. Abou-Khalil، نويسنده , , M.I. and Moustafa، نويسنده , , M.N. and Abbas، نويسنده , , H. and Muramatsu، نويسنده , , D. and Yanikoglu، نويسنده , , B. and Kholmatov، نويسنده , , A. and Martinez-Diaz، نويسنده , , M. and Fierrez، نويسنده , , J. and Ortega-Garcia، نويسنده , , J. and Roure Alcobé، نويسنده , , J. and Fabregas، نويسنده , , J. and Faundez-Zanuy، نويسنده , , M. and Pascual-Gaspar، نويسنده , , J.M. and Cardeٌoso-Payo، نويسنده , , V. and Vivaracho-Pascual، نويسنده , , C.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Pages
11
From page
993
To page
1003
Abstract
In this paper, we present the main results of the BioSecure Signature Evaluation Campaign (BSECʹ2009). The objective of BSECʹ2009 was to evaluate different online signature algorithms on two tasks: the first one aims at studying the influence of acquisition conditions (digitizing tablet or PDA) on systemsʹ performance; the second one aims at studying the impact of information content in signatures on systemsʹ performance. In BSECʹ2009, the two BioSecure Data Sets DS2 and DS3 are used for tests, both containing data of the same 382 people, acquired respectively on a digitizing tablet and on a PDA. The results of the 12 systems involved in this evaluation campaign are reported and analyzed in detail in this paper. Experimental results reveal a 2.2% EER for skilled forgeries and a 0.51% EER for random forgeries on DS2; and a 4.97% EER for skilled forgeries and a 0.55% EER for random forgeries on DS3.
Keywords
Evaluations , Quality , Signature Categorization , On-line signature verification , entropy
Journal title
PATTERN RECOGNITION
Serial Year
2012
Journal title
PATTERN RECOGNITION
Record number
1734362
Link To Document