Methods to find community based on edge centrality

Divisive algorithms are of great importance for community detection in complex networks. One algorithm proposed by Girvan and Newman (GN) based on an edge centrality named betweenness, is a typical representative of this field. Here we studied three edge centralities based on network topology, walks and paths respectively to quantify the relevance of each edge in a network, and proposed a divisive algorithm based on the rationale of GN algorithm for finding communities that removes edges iteratively according to the edge centrality values in a certain order. In addition, we gave a comparison analysis of these measures with the edge betweenness and information centrality. We found the principal difference among these measures in the partition procedure is that the edge centrality based on walks first removes the edge connected with a leaf vertex, but the others first delete the edge as a bridge between communities. It indicates that the edge centrality based on walks is harder to uncover communities than other edge centralities. We also tested these measures for community detection. The results showed that the edge information centrality outperforms other measures, the edge centrality based on walks obtains the worst results, and the edge betweenness gains better performance than the edge centrality based on network topology. We also discussed our method’s efficiency and found that the edge centrality based on walks has a high time complexity and is not suitable for large networks.