Title of article :
Multimarker Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Risk: The Womenʹs Health Initiative
Author/Authors :
Kim، نويسنده , , Hyeon Chang and Greenland، نويسنده , , Philip and Rossouw، نويسنده , , Jacques E. and Manson، نويسنده , , JoAnn E. and Cochrane، نويسنده , , Barbara B. and Lasser، نويسنده , , Norman L. and Limacher، نويسنده , , Marian C. and Lloyd-Jones، نويسنده , , Donald M. and Margolis، نويسنده , , Karen L. and Robinson، نويسنده , , Jennifer G.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
Pages :
12
From page :
2080
To page :
2091
Abstract :
Objectives m of this study was to investigate whether multiple biomarkers contribute to improved coronary heart disease (CHD) risk prediction in post-menopausal women compared with assessment using traditional risk factors (TRFs) only. ound ility of newer biomarkers remains uncertain when added to predictive models using only TRFs for CHD risk assessment. s menʹs Health Initiative Hormone Trials enrolled 27,347 post-menopausal women ages 50 to 79 years. Associations of TRFs and 18 biomarkers were assessed in a nested case-control study including 321 patients with CHD and 743 controls. Four prediction equations for 5-year CHD risk were compared: 2 Framingham risk score covariate models; a TRF model including statin treatment, hormone treatment, and cardiovascular disease history as well as the Framingham risk score covariates; and an additional biomarker model that additionally included the 5 significantly associated markers of the 18 tested (interleukin-6, d-dimer, coagulation factor VIII, von Willebrand factor, and homocysteine). s F model showed an improved C-statistic (0.729 vs. 0.699, p = 0.001) and net reclassification improvement (6.42%) compared with the Framingham risk score model. The additional biomarker model showed additional improvement in the C-statistic (0.751 vs. 0.729, p = 0.001) and net reclassification improvement (6.45%) compared with the TRF model. Predicted CHD risks on a continuous scale showed high agreement between the TRF and additional biomarker models (Spearmanʹs coefficient = 0.918). Among the 18 biomarkers measured, C-reactive protein level did not significantly improve CHD prediction either alone or in combination with other biomarkers. sions te improvement in CHD risk prediction was found when an 18-biomarker panel was added to predictive models using TRFs in post-menopausal women.
Keywords :
Coronary Heart Disease , Prediction , Biomarker
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2010
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
1747457
Link To Document :
بازگشت