Title of article :
The Impact of Patient and Lesion Complexity on Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes After Revascularization With Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Substudy of the RESOLUTE All Comers Trial (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent
Author/Authors :
Stefanini، نويسنده , , Giulio G. and Serruys، نويسنده , , Patrick W. and Silber، نويسنده , , Sigmund and Khattab، نويسنده , , Ahmed A. and van Geuns، نويسنده , , Robert J. and Richardt، نويسنده , , Gert and Buszman، نويسنده , , Pawel E. and Kelbوk، نويسنده , , Henning and van Boven، نويسنده , , Adrianus J. and Hofma، نويسنده , , Sjoerd H. and Linke، نويسنده , , Axel and Klauss، نويسنده , , Volker، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
Pages :
12
From page :
2221
To page :
2232
Abstract :
Objectives m of this study was to investigate the impact of patient and lesion complexity on outcomes with newer-generation zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and everolimus-eluting stents (EES). ound al and angiographic outcomes of newer-generation stents have not been described among complex patients. s ts enrolled in the RESOLUTE All Comers trial (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) were stratified into “complex” and “simple.” s 92 patients, 1,520 (66.3%) were complex and treated with ZES (n = 764) or EES (n = 756). Event rates were higher among complex patients, and results did not differ between ZES and EES, regardless of complexity. At 1 year, target lesion failure was 8.9% in ZES- and 9.7% in EES-treated complex patients (p = 0.66) and 6.8% in ZES- and 5.7% in EES-treated simple patients (p = 0.55). Rates of cardiac death (1.3% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.24), target-vessel myocardial infarction (4.3% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.90), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (4.4% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.80) were similar for both stent types among complex patients. Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 20 (1.3%) complex patients with no difference between ZES (1.7%) and EES (0.9%, p = 0.26). Angiographic follow-up showed similar results for ZES and EES in terms of in-stent percentage diameter stenosis (22.2 ± 15.4% vs. 21.4 ± 15.8%, p = 0.67) and in-segment binary restenosis (6.6% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.82) in the complex group. sions s all-comers randomized trial, major adverse cardiovascular events were more frequent among complex than simple patients. The newer-generation ZES and EES proved to be safe and effective, regardless of complexity, with similar clinical and angiographic outcomes for both stent types through 1 year. (RESOLUTE-III All Comers Trial: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; NCT00617084)
Keywords :
Zotarolimus , Complex , off-label , drug-eluting stent , Everolimus
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year :
2011
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number :
1752203
Link To Document :
بازگشت