Title of article :
Assessing the Association of Appropriateness of Coronary Revascularization and Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease
Author/Authors :
Ko، نويسنده , , Dennis T. and Guo، نويسنده , , Helen and Wijeysundera، نويسنده , , Harindra C. and Natarajan، نويسنده , , Madhu K. and Nagpal، نويسنده , , A. Dave and Feindel، نويسنده , , Christopher M. and Kingsbury، نويسنده , , Kori and Cohen، نويسنده , , Eric A. and Tu، نويسنده , , Jack V.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Abstract :
Objectives
udy assessed the appropriateness of coronary revascularization in Ontario, Canada, and examined its association with longer-term outcomes.
ound
gh appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization have been developed to improve the rational use of cardiac invasive procedures, it is unknown whether greater adherence to appropriateness guidelines is associated with improved clinical outcomes in stable coronary artery disease.
s
lation-based cohort of stable patients undergoing cardiac catheterization was assembled from April 1, 2006, to March 31, 2007. The appropriateness for coronary revascularization at the time of coronary angiography was retrospectively adjudicated using the appropriate use criteria. Clinical outcomes between coronary revascularization and medical treatment without revascularization, stratified by appropriateness categories, were compared.
s
25 patients with stable coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting was only performed in 69% who had an appropriate indication for coronary revascularization. Coronary revascularization was associated with a lower adjusted hazard of death or acute coronary syndrome (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42 to 0.88) at 3 years compared with medical therapy in appropriate patients. The rate of coronary revascularization was 54% in the uncertain category and 45% in the inappropriate category. No significant difference in death or acute coronary syndrome between coronary revascularization and no revascularization in the uncertain category (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.28 to 1.16) and the inappropriate category (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.48 to 2.02) was observed.
sions
the appropriateness use criteria, we identified substantial underutilization and overutilization of coronary revascularization in contemporary clinical practice. Underutilization of coronary revascularization is associated with significantly increased risks of adverse outcomes in patients with appropriate indications.
Keywords :
appropriateness , Outcomes , Coronary Revascularization
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Journal title :
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)