Title of article
Drug-Eluting Balloon Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Infrapopliteal Arterial Revascularization in Critical Limb Ischemia: 12-Month Results From the IN.PACT DEEP Randomized Trial
Author/Authors
Zeller، نويسنده , , Thomas G. Baumgartner، نويسنده , , Iris and Scheinert، نويسنده , , Dierk and Brodmann، نويسنده , , Marianne and Bosiers، نويسنده , , Marc and Micari، نويسنده , , Antonio and Peeters، نويسنده , , Patrick and Vermassen، نويسنده , , Frank and Landini، نويسنده , , Mario and Snead، نويسنده , , David B. and Kent، نويسنده , , K. Craig and Rocha-Singh، نويسنده , , Krishna J.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Pages
9
From page
1568
To page
1576
Abstract
AbstractBackground
luting balloons (DEB) may reduce infrapopliteal restenosis and reintervention rates versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and improve wound healing/limb preservation.
ives
al of this clinical trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of IN.PACT Amphirion drug-eluting balloons (IA-DEB) compared to PTA for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI).
s
a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial with independent clinical event adjudication and angiographic and wound core laboratories 358 CLI patients were randomized 2:1 to IA-DEB or PTA. The 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints through 12 months were clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and late lumen loss (LLL). The primary safety endpoint through 6 months was a composite of all-cause mortality, major amputation, and CD-TLR.
s
al characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Significant baseline differences between the IA-DEB and PTA arms included mean lesion length (10.2 cm vs. 12.9 cm; p = 0.002), impaired inflow (40.7% vs. 28.8%; p = 0.035), and previous target limb revascularization (32.2% vs. 21.8%; p = 0.047). Primary efficacy results of IA-DEB versus PTA were CD-TLR of 9.2% versus 13.1% (p = 0.291) and LLL of 0.61 ± 0.78 mm versus 0.62 ± 0.78 mm (p = 0.950). Primary safety endpoints were 17.7% versus 15.8% (p = 0.021) and met the noninferiority hypothesis. A safety signal driven by major amputations through 12 months was observed in the IA-DEB arm versus the PTA arm (8.8% vs. 3.6%; p = 0.080).
sions
ients with CLI, IA-DEB had comparable efficacy to PTA. While primary safety was met, there was a trend towards an increased major amputation rate through 12 months compared to PTA. (Study of IN.PACT Amphirion™ Drug Eluting Balloon vs. Standard PTA for the Treatment of Below the Knee Critical Limb Ischemia [INPACT-DEEP]; NCT00941733)
Keywords
Critical limb ischemia , drug-eluting balloon , Peripheral vascular disease
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Serial Year
2014
Journal title
JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology)
Record number
1759455
Link To Document