Title of article :
Relative impact of earlier diagnosis and improved treatment on survival for colorectal cancer: A US database study among elderly patients
Author/Authors :
Tong، نويسنده , , Liyue and Ahn، نويسنده , , Chul and Symanski، نويسنده , , Elaine and Lai، نويسنده , , Dejian and Du، نويسنده , , Xianglin L. Du، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Pages :
8
From page :
733
To page :
740
Abstract :
AbstractPurposes imate what proportion of improvement in relative survival was attributable to smaller stage/size due to early detection and what proportion was attributable to cancer chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). s died 69,718 patients with CRC aged ≥66 years in 1992–2009 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. Study periods were categorized into three periods according to the major changes or advances in screening and chemotherapy regimens: (1) Period-1 (1992–1995), during which there was no evidence-based recommendation for routine CRC screening and 5-fluorouracil was the mainstay for chemotherapy; (2) Period-2 (1996–2000), during which evidences and guidelines supported the use of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and sigmoidoscopy for routine CRC screening; and (3) Period-3 (2001–2009), during which Medicare Program added the full coverage for colonoscopy screening to average-risk individuals, and several newly developed chemotherapy regimens were approved. Outcome variables included the likelihood of being diagnosed at an early stage or with a small tumor size, and improvement in relative survival. s ed to period-1, likelihood of being diagnosed with early stage CRC increased by 20% in period-2 (odds ratio = 1.2, 95%CI: 1.1–1.2) and 30% in period-3 (1.3, 1.2–1.4); and likelihood of being diagnosed with small-size CRC increased by 60% in period-2 and 110% in period-3. Similarly, 5-year overall relative survival increased from 51% in period-1 to 56% in period-2 and 60% in period-3. Increase in survival attributable to migration in stage/size was 9% in period-2 and 20% in period-3, while the remaining survival improvement during period-2 and period-3 were largely attributable to more effective chemotherapy regimens (≥71.6%) and other treatment factors (≤25%). sions ements in CRC screening resulted in a migration of CRC toward earlier tumor stage and smaller size, which contributed to ≤20% of survival increase. Survival improvement over the past 2 decades was largely explained by more effective chemotherapy regimens (≥71.6%).
Keywords :
Tumor stage and size migration , Colorectal Cancer , Survival , chemotherapy
Journal title :
Cancer Epidemiology
Serial Year :
2014
Journal title :
Cancer Epidemiology
Record number :
1767108
Link To Document :
بازگشت