Title of article :
Use of Multiple Imputation to Correct for Nonresponse Bias in a Survey of Urologic Symptoms among African-American Men
Author/Authors :
Taylor، Jeremy M. G. نويسنده , , Cooper، Kristine L. نويسنده , , Wei، John T. نويسنده , , Sarma، Aruna V. نويسنده , , Raghunathan، Trivellore E. نويسنده , , Heeringa، Steve G. نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 52 سال 2015
Abstract :
The Flint Men’s Health Study is an ongoing population-based study of African-American men designed to address questions related to prostate cancer and urologic symptoms. The initial phase of the study was conducted in 1996–1997 in two stages: an interviewer-administered survey followed by a clinical examination. The response rate in the clinical examination phase was 52%. Thus, some data were missing for clinical examination variables, diminishing the generalizability of the results to the general population. This paper is a case study demonstrating the application of multiple imputation to address important questions related to prostate cancer and urologic symptoms in a data set with missing values. On the basis of the observed clinical examination data, the American Urological Association Symptoms Score showed a surprising reduction in symptoms in the oldest age group, but after multiple imputation there was a monotonically increasing trend with age. It appeared that multiple imputation corrected for nonresponse bias associated with the observed data. For other outcome measures—namely, the age-adjusted 95th percentile of prostate-specific antigen level and the association between urologic symptoms and prostate volume—results from the observed data and the multiply imputed data were similar.
Keywords :
bias , meta-analysis , genetics , epidemiology
Journal title :
American Journal of Epidemiology
Journal title :
American Journal of Epidemiology