Author/Authors :
Paul، نويسنده , , Sanhita and Ghosh، نويسنده , , Anirudha and Dudin، نويسنده , , Pavel and Barinov، نويسنده , , Alexei and Chakraborty، نويسنده , , Anirban and Ray، نويسنده , , Sugata and Sarma، نويسنده , , D.D. and Oishi، نويسنده , , Shuji and Raj، نويسنده , , Satyabrata، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
We have investigated the validity of percolation model, which is quite often invoked to explain the metal–insulator transition in sodium tungsten bronzes, NaxWO3 by photoelectron spectromicroscopy. The spatially resolved direct spectromicroscopic probing on both the insulating and metallic phases of high quality single crystals of NaxWO3 reveals the absence of any microscopic inhomogeneities embedded in the system within the experimental limit. Neither any metallic domains in the insulating host nor any insulating domains in the metallic host have been found to support the validity of percolation model to explain the metal–insulator transition in NaxWO3. The possible origin of insulating phase in NaxWO3 is due to the Anderson localization of all the states near EF. The localization occurs because of the strong disorder arising from random distribution of Na+ ions in the WO3 lattice.
Keywords :
A. Insulators , E. Synchrotron radiation , E. Photoelectron spectroscopies , D. Phase transitions