Title of article :
Hand-Assisted, Conventional and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Partial Nephrectomy without Ischemia Using a Microwave Tissue Coagulator
Author/Authors :
Nozaki، Tetsuo نويسنده Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences for Research, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930- 0194, Japan. , , Asao، Yoshihiro نويسنده Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences for Research, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930- 0194, Japan. , , Katoh، Tomonori نويسنده Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences for Research, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930- 0194, Japan. , , Yasuda، Kenji نويسنده Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences for Research, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930- 0194, Japan. , , Fuse، Hideki نويسنده Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences for Research, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930- 0194, Japan. ,
Issue Information :
دوماهنامه با شماره پیاپی 43 سال 2014
Pages :
7
From page :
1595
To page :
1601
Abstract :
Purpose: We report our experience of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy without ischemia using a microwave tissue coagulator (MTC) for hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (HALPN), conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (CLPN), and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for partial nephrectomy (LESSPN). We retrospectively compared the results of these techniques to better define the individual role and the benefits. Materials and Methods: From July 2005 to September 2012, 28 patients with small and exophytic renal tumors underwent HALPN (n = 12), CLPN (n = 10) and LESSPN (n = 6). In these procedures, the surgeon used an MTC for circumferential coagulation around the tumor. After coagulation, the tumor was resected without renal pedicle clamping. Results: The mean operative time was 259, 194 and 174 min for the HALPN, CLPN and LESSPN groups respectively. Two patients (one in HALPN group and one in LESSPN group) converted to laparotomy due to an inability to maintain hemostasis; however, there were no conversions to ischemic partial nephrectomy or radical nephrectomy. No differences between HALPN, CLPN and LESSPN were noted in terms of estimated blood loss, measured analgesic requirements, outcomes, or complications. Conclusion: We believe that these techniques are feasible and that they minimize the risk of unexpected collateral thermal damage by appropriate MTC needle puncture. When deciding to use HALPN, CLPN or LESSPN, our findings suggest that the choice of surgical approach should depend on the patient’s individual circumstance.
Journal title :
Urology Journal
Serial Year :
2014
Journal title :
Urology Journal
Record number :
1801798
Link To Document :
بازگشت